-
Some thoughts on the tension between religion and individual rights
In contrasting monotheistic religions with individual rights we end up with a messy question. If we are to talk about morality in a “universal vs. conventional” way we are inevitably led to the problem of origin. Consider it in terms of this example- Various religions state that they have the truth. By no means does this give us knowledge to say that none of them has the truth. That would a be a fallacy. What we do know is that they cannot all have the truth. Either one of them does, of none of them do. If one of them does, then the morality of that religion is superior to any conception of individual rights. If we decide that all of them are wrong. We have a problem. How do we ground individual rights? How do you decide what rights should be granted to all? How will you gather consensus. This method seems problematic.
Thus, when we consider the versus mentality of contrasting monotheistic religions and individual rights we find that that just because one person or one group of people thinks that they should have a particular right doesn’t necessarily imply that they should have that right.
Monotheistic religions( and most other religions) have the explanatory foundation upon which a group can attempt to understand morality. Morality is a means to an end in all of these religions. So, the question changes drastically. Love for God becomes superior to individual rights for the religious person. The tension comes from compulsion. Either the religious person will attempt to force others to follow their religion or the surrounding community will attempt to force the religious person to break away from their morality. In social terms, this would be akin to turning your back on the one you love. Thus this tension between rights and religion is formed by both sides misunderstanding themselves and one another. This tension comes out of fear. The fear that comes from insecurity.So my answer to the question is that we shouldn’t “stir the pot”.
Mature religious people and mature irreligious people need to have tolerance. They need recognize that they can disagree and still respect one another. Politically, socially, emotionally, physically respect one another. Why must their be a tension? It only comes out of the two groups fighting with one another. Why not discuss and hash out their differences? -
We always follow our desire
Here and Now there is a stirring inside my head.
There are mistaken identities that manifest themselves in the heat of mental struggle each day. One of these issues is the battle between what is really happening in the minds of other people regarding me. There is an issue of pride that seems to rear its ugliness out into the light of day when I least expect it. There are small epiphanies that ride on whispered feelings, they happen briefly before they explode into a surrogate example of ignorance. Never before have I had the same clarity, never before has this dark creature spread and sunk its claws into the recess of my soul. This demonic possession beleaguers the heart. The harassment is worst in the moments that leave me feeling like a ghost. Wondering if I can bear the thought of another second of introspection. This is my battle, a battle all humans share, albeit in different forms.
“The self” becomes an enemy. In one sense this is good. As it is the truth missing from the silly idea that we all must be dripping with self esteem. This view would collapse the mind in on a swollen heart. Poetic abstracts aside, one must recognize that both the lack of self worth,(my case) and the bellow of pride so common today are both responses to an inner problem. Every person has to reconcile the confusion in their being. This is an ontological necessity that is no mere aspect of being, but rather a presupposition for being. Each person must define the problem. Once set these parameters determine the possible answer sets. In cases such as mine, the inner depravity of the mind is obvious. providing ample ammunition and opportunity to crush any attempt at self esteem, especially in terms of one’s own accomplishments. This is merely a reverse pride. Pride is the retaliation of human souls against God. -
Word
I think that words have power. They can build romances, ruin friendships, stifle wars, capture imaginations. What else can make such claims? It is in words that we spell out what we think, say, and do. They are the medium we use to communicate. Words are the atoms of language. The metaphorical scotch tape that holds everything together. For it is by words that we understand, wonder, question, inspect, elaborate, and know. Some may object to this. They might shrug their shoulders and say “my feelings are inexplicable, no words can do them justice.” I always laugh because it sounds like a joke. Though at times words are hard to come by, ultimately they are pervasive. Though feelings are hard to explain, in calling them inexplicable you are explaining them, with WORDS! Such irony is not lost, such humor is obvious because you speak my language. Maybe I spoke too soon. ”Do you like, speak English? I mean this is America, you know? We should totally all speak English.” No respect for other languages is funny when you don’t speak English properly.
So words are losing their meanings, which frankly is all they have. For they are nothing more than beautiful place holders, like a fine china set. Dishes are nouns, and utensils verbs, etc. You get the idea. What happens when you drop dishes on the ground? They shatter. Useless, right? What happens when you tear words from their meanings, and make them mean any damn thing? They shatter. Useless. -
well…..
(Source: cait-hickey)
-
Ideals, perfection, acceptance-criss crossed thoughts.
I have ideals. I have mind pictures. They are solid. They are wonderful. They are to be strived for, yet, I fail. I never reach the perfection I see. Where do pragmatism and idealism meet? Do they? When they do, they exchange pleasantries like enemies. Eyeing one another with malicious intent, waiting for that wrong move one of them is bound to make. So acceptance doesn’t matter. At least not in the way I first thought. It isn’t important that I’m the best. Or that I do a good enough job, to earn some fleeting sense of accomplishment. It’s about God. Accepting His love. Not questioning his genuine affection. It’s faith. It’s confidence. Therefore, work for Him, not some ideal. It will change how you think. -
Self worth
I relive moments in old memories that leave me panting and desiring for feelings that I seldom get in the way I expect them. Many of them have to do with relationships. With a heavy heart my mind sears my actions into the back of my skull, my teeth gnash at the sight. I cringe as my brain trips over the subtleties I miss again, and again. By mixing what I feel, with what I think, I’ve placed myself in a position that, for some reason appears untenable on the worst of days. The clinch is that, as far as I know, my position is absolutely acceptable. It is only in my own mind, in the occasional bouts of unworthiness that my person appears to be so socially poor. In each life there are moments of both positive and negative affirmation. From family, friends, and the like. The trick seems to be in the act of filtering the truth out of the feedback we receive. Seems simple right? Then why do so many struggle with it? It isn’t just me. The question then becomes: Who determines our worth? Is it God, yourself, media, family, friends, or something else?
-
:D
Pooh is my favorite philosopher.
http://www.amazon.com/Pooh-Philosophers-Philosophy-Winnie-Pooh/dp/0525455205 -
Jealousy
Jealousy is an emotion
It carves, and perpetuates a near dystopian state of residence within the mind.
While there it whispers in the most primitive of voices about all the possibilities of loss, targeting our insecurities, attempting to rot our most beloved truths at their very foundations. How should it be dealt with?The answer, lies in faith.
-
I feel this is a statement all must hear.
Whether you accept the Bible and God or not, logically speaking, this argument is rubbish (false analogy fallacy, an appeal to ridicule, …) Do people actually make this claim?
-
"There is no need to be worried by facetious people who try to make the Christian hope of “heaven” ridiculous by saying they do not want “to spend eternity playing harps.” The answer to such people is that if they cannot understand books written for grown-ups, they should not talk about them. All the scriptural imagery (harps, crowns, gold etc.) is, of course, a merely symbolic attempt to express the inexpressible. Musical instruments are mentioned because for many people (not all) music is the thing known in the present life which most strongly suggests ecstasy and infinity. Crowns are mentioned to suggest the fact that those who are united with God in eternity share His splendour and power and joy. Gold is mentioned to suggest the timelessness of Heaven (gold does not rust) and the preciousness of it. People who take these symbols literally might as well think that when Christ told us to be like doves, He meant that we were to lay eggs."- C. S. Lewis, Mere Christianity
Sometimes, I crack open this book, and stare at a couple pages in the morning. Lewis never fails to present the most poignant thought experiments, which tend to be pondered and regaled throughout the course of the day.